1/31/2024 0 Comments Gmsh verion 2 asciiIt is possible to convert single-stream Fluent meshes, including the 2 dimensional geometries. The file must be written in ASCII format, which is not the default option in Fluent. xml format so I do not have made any mistake when creating the geo files. Fluent writes mesh data to a single file with a. I am using a geometry and a mesh that was taken from tutorial on the web and was converted succesfully to dolphin. Sudo apt-get install -no-install-recommends fenics I am using ubuntu 18.04 and installed FEniCS by the command ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '7 5905 1 5905\n' When prompted for the msh options, select Version 2 ASCII format, for some reason ticking select all elements or not generates the same file for me, it works in both cases. I'm using gmsh version 4.0.7 Win64 on Windows 10. stl file into gmsh, then exported into a Mesh Gmsh MSH (.msh) format. As such, I am using the physical groups to identify regions where boundary conditions apply and where material types are assigned. nvert2xml(ifilename, ofilename, iformat=iformat)įile "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dolfin_utils/meshconvert/meshconvert.py", line 1301, in convert2xmlĬonvert(ifilename, XmlHandler(ofilename), iformat=iformat)įile "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dolfin_utils/meshconvert/meshconvert.py", line 1322, in convertįile "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dolfin_utils/meshconvert/meshconvert.py", line 271, in gmsh2xml msh ASCII file (format version 2) as an input for a finite element program. Smaller files don't just save disk space: they're also faster to process and transfer via e-mail or on servers.Hi, I get the following error when I run the command:ĭolfin-convert mymesh.msh mymesh.xml Traceback (most recent call last):įile "/usr/bin/dolfin-convert", line 132, in įile "/usr/bin/dolfin-convert", line 79, in main The ASCII STL format is older than the binary format, so you may find some very old software can only understand the ASCII STL files, but unless you're working with such old software, it's usually better to use the binary format. Most slicers can't use these colours anyway - and subsequently, ignore color information on import. Whether this matters to you depends on what printing technology you'll be using. If your model has coloured triangles, you might find that the binary STL preserves the colours, while the ASCII STL loses the colours. Some tools have a way of putting colour information into the binary STL format, which isn't possible with the ASCII format. This is what fred_dot_u experienced in his answer. In this case, it'll make a huge difference which one you use, but you'll only find out when one goes wrong. The same is true of the slicer, which may have a bug reading one of the two kinds of STL but not the other. One exporter may have a bug that the other exporter doesn't. I don't know about Meshmixer specifically, but some tools will have completely different code paths for exporting the two formats. > />/ 3) Export from EnGrid as a gmsh ascii V2. geo file, generate mesh and save as ascii V1 > />/. There are a couple of important exceptions here: I found that the following > />/ procedure results in a correct translation of the mesh from gmsh to Elmer. automatically determines whether an input file is version 1 or version 2. The number of triangles and the dimensions of the printed model will stay the same. At present, UCD (unstructured cell data), DB Mesh, XDA, Gmsh, Tecplot, UNV. That's to say, if you take the exact same model, save it as a binary STL and as an ASCII STL, the binary STL file will take up fewer bytes on disk. The two formats contain the same information about the model, but the binary format is much more compact, so it will produce smaller files from the same part but they should work the same.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |